Introduction

On August 8, 2023, a disastrous wildfire broke out on Maui Island in Hawaii, causing huge human and property losses. This wildfire was considered the worst in Hawaii’s history and the most tragic in the United States in recent years. According to official statistics, the wildfire killed at least 110 people, destroyed more than 2,200 buildings, and caused an estimated loss of nearly $6 billion. The cause of the wildfire has not been determined, but it may be related to factors such as collapsed power poles, strong winds, drought, etc. The response and rescue of the wildfire also received criticism, accusing the government of slow reaction, failure of the alarm system, lack of relief supplies, etc.

However, in addition to these official reports, some netizens and media people have raised some unusual phenomena and opinions, believing that this wildfire may hide deeper secrets. They shared some shocking and confusing videos and pictures on social media and online platforms, showing energy weapons falling from the sky, fire that flows like water, government concealment and negligence, etc. They questioned whether this wildfire was a natural disaster or a man-made one? Did the US military use secret weapons to conduct some kind of test or attack? They called on the public to pay attention to the Hawaii wildfire incident, maintain rationality and critical thinking, and pursue truth and justice.

This article aims to explore the possible truth and motives behind the Hawaii wildfire by analyzing some unusual phenomena and opinions.

 

Energy weapons falling from the sky

In the Hawaii wildfire incident, a video attracted a lot of attention and speculation. This video was taken by a netizen named Jack with WildGuarder night vision binoculars. He shared the video on Twitter and attached the following text: This “lightning” doesn’t look remotely natural. It looks more like a Directed Energy Weapon.

The video shows that in the night sky, a bright light suddenly appears, like a laser or lightning, shining on a house, and then the house explodes and catches fire. The video shooter claimed that this was a secret weapon used by the US Department of Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), with the purpose of eliminating some targets or creating chaos.

How authentic and credible is this video? We can analyze it from the following aspects:

First, we need to consider the source and quality of the video. The video was taken and uploaded by an ordinary netizen, and it has not been verified or certified by any official or professional institution. The video is also not very clear, and it may have been edited or tampered with. Therefore, we cannot fully trust the content of the video, nor can we rule out the possibility that someone deliberately created rumors or panic.

Second, we need to consider whether the bright light in the video is really an energy weapon, and whether it is related to DARPA. According to the web page results I searched, DARPA is indeed researching and developing some advanced space weapons and energy weapons, such as lasers, microwaves, particle beams, etc. These weapons can emit high-energy beams from the air or the ground, causing damage or destruction to targets in the air or on the ground. However, these weapons are currently in the experimental stage and have not been publicly demonstrated. Moreover, these weapons usually require a lot of power and equipment to support, and it is unlikely that they will be secretly launched at night. Therefore, we cannot easily assume that the bright light in the video is DARPA’s energy weapon, nor can we determine whether DARPA was involved in the Hawaii wildfire incident.

Finally, we need to consider whether the explosion and fire in the video are related to the bright light. According to common sense and physical principles, energy weapons will generate a lot of heat and shock waves when they hit objects, causing objects to explode or catch fire. But this also depends on the material and structure of the object, as well as the temperature and humidity of the surrounding environment. It is possible that the house in the video itself contained flammable and explosive substances, or was already ignited by other fire sources, and only triggered a larger explosion and fire under the bright light. Therefore, we cannot conclude that the explosion and fire in the video were caused by the bright light, nor can we exclude other possible causes or coincidences.

In summary, we can see that the energy weapon falling from the sky in the video is not a conclusive fact, but a phenomenon that needs further confirmation and explanation. We need more evidence and analysis to judge the authenticity and meaning of the video, as well as whether DARPA was involved in the Hawaii wildfire incident.

 

Fire that flows like water

In addition to the energy weapon falling from the sky, another phenomenon that attracted the attention and discussion of netizens and media people is the fire that flows like water. This fire does not look like ordinary flames, but like a liquid or gel, rolling and jumping on the ground, only burning specific objects, without affecting the surrounding environment. Some people think that this is a new type of chemical or biological weapon, which may contain some flammable or self-igniting substances.

What are the composition and source of this fire? We can analyze it from the following aspects:

First, we need to consider the characteristics and behavior of the fire. Fire is a product of oxidation reaction, which usually requires three conditions: combustible material, oxygen and ignition source. The shape, color, temperature and speed of the fire depend on factors such as the nature of the combustible material, the concentration of oxygen and the intensity of the ignition source. Some substances have high flammability or self-ignition, such as some metal powders, oils, alcohols, gasoline, etc. These substances will quickly undergo oxidation reaction when they come into contact with air or water, producing a lot of heat and light, forming flames. Some substances also have high fluidity or viscosity, such as some liquids or gels, such as gasoline, alcohol, Vaseline, etc. These substances will flow or roll on the ground like water after catching fire, and are not easy to be extinguished.

Second, we need to consider the source and distribution of the fire. According to the video results I searched, the fire that flows like water mainly appeared in the Hawaii wildfire incident, especially near Lahaina town on Maui Island. These videos were taken and uploaded to social media by many people at close range with their phones. The videos show that when the wildfire spread to Lahaina town, some places suddenly burst out some strange flames, which rolled and jumped on the road surface, only burning some vehicles, houses or other objects, without spreading to other places. The videos also heard the voices of panic and confusion from the people, who did not know where this fire came from or how to put it out.

Finally, we need to consider whether the fire is a new type of chemical or biological weapon, and the possible makers and targets. According to the web page results I searched, chemical or biological weapons are weapons that use certain chemical substances or biological agents to cause harm or kill people, animals or plants or environment. These weapons usually require professional equipment and technology to manufacture and use, and have strong concealment and lethality. However, these weapons also have many limitations and risks, such as difficult to control, susceptible to environmental influences, may trigger retaliation or revenge, etc. Therefore, we cannot easily assume that the fire that flows like water is a new type of chemical or biological weapon, nor can we determine whether someone deliberately made and used this weapon, and what their purpose and motive are.

In summary, we can see that the fire that flows like water is not a simple phenomenon, but a puzzle that needs further confirmation and explanation. We need more evidence and analysis to determine the composition and source of the fire, and whether someone used some new type of weapon to create the Hawaii wildfire incident.

 

The government’s response and concealment

In addition to the energy weapon falling from the sky and the fire that flows like water, another issue that aroused the questioning and criticism of netizens and media people is the government’s response and concealment. Many people accused the government of negligence and inaction in the Hawaii wildfire incident, failing to activate the emergency warning system in time, failing to effectively organize and coordinate rescue operations, failing to disclose the truth and consequences of the incident openly and transparently. Among them, the most representative voice came from Stew Peters, who has 379,000 followers on Twitter, who attacked the government’s irresponsibility and untrustworthiness in several tweets.

Stew Peters is an online host who calls himself a “post-apocalyptic war leader”. He hosts a show called “The Stew Peters Show”, which specializes in exposing and criticizing the government and military’s conspiracies and crimes. He posted some information and opinions about the Hawaii wildfire incident on Twitter, such as:

From these tweets, we can see that Stew Peters is extremely dissatisfied and suspicious of the government’s response and concealment. He believes that the government is the behind-the-scenes black hand of the Hawaii wildfire incident, using the US military’s secret weapons to deal with their own people, while covering up the truth and consequences, and even using sensitive topics such as race, politics, etc. to divert the public’s attention. He urges people to stay alert and sober, and not to be deceived by the government’s lies.

Are Stew Peters’ views reasonable and well-founded? We can analyze it from the following aspects:

First, we need to consider Stew Peters’ source of information and credibility. Stew Peters is an online host, not a professional journalist or analyst. The information and opinions he posted have not been verified or certified by any official or professional institution. The source of information he relies on may be some unverified or tampered videos, pictures, articles, etc. Therefore, we cannot fully trust what Stew Peters says, nor can we rule out the possibility that he may deliberately create fake news or panic for the sake of attracting attention or spreading rumors.

Second, we need to consider whether the government really failed to activate the emergency warning system in time, and whether there was any concealment or cover-up of the truth. The government did not activate the outdoor alarm system in the Hawaii wildfire incident, but notified the public through other means such as mobile phones, TV, radio, etc. The government’s explanation is that the alarm system is only used to remind people to seek more information, not necessarily to evacuate. Moreover, due to the difficulty and unpredictability of the speed and scope of the wildfire, the alarm system may cause more confusion and panic. The government also said that they have tried their best to organize and coordinate rescue operations, but due to the scale and complexity of the wildfire, as well as the lack of manpower and resources, some regrets and losses have occurred. The government also promised that they would disclose the truth and consequences of the incident openly and transparently, as well as hold accountable those responsible.

Finally, we need to consider whether the government has any collusion or interest relationship with the US military, and the possible motives and consequences. There is no obvious connection or conflict between the government and the US military, nor is there any evidence that they have a common purpose or plan. The government did not gain any benefits or interests from the Hawaii wildfire incident, but suffered a lot of losses and pressures. If the government really used the US military’s secret weapons to create the Hawaii wildfire incident, what was their motive? What did they want to achieve? How did they face the questioning and condemnation of the public and the international community? These questions do not have a reasonable or powerful answer.

Conclusion

In summary, we can see that Stew Peters has an extreme and radical attitude towards the government’s response and concealment. He did not provide sufficient and effective evidence and arguments to support his views, but based on some partial and false information to make speculations and accusations. We need more facts and analysis to judge whether the government has been negligent or inactive in the Hawaii wildfire incident, and whether there has been any concealment or cover-up of the truth.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *